Fibonacci Spiral vs Walter Russell's Spiral

Start Animation

Comparing Natural and Cosmic Spirals

This visualization juxtaposes two profound spiral concepts: the Fibonacci spiral and Walter Russell's cosmic spiral. By presenting these side by side, we can explore the similarities and differences between nature's mathematical beauty and Russell's vision of cosmic energy patterns.

Left: Fibonacci Spiral - This spiral is based on the Fibonacci sequence, where each number is the sum of the two preceding ones. It's found throughout nature, from the arrangement of leaves on a stem to the shape of galaxies. The Fibonacci spiral represents natural growth patterns and optimal space-filling.

Right: Walter Russell's Spiral - This spiral is based on Russell's cosmic model, which he believed represented the fundamental pattern of creation and energy flow in the universe. It's set within a cubic wave field, symbolizing the structured, rhythmic nature of cosmic forces.

Key observations:

• The Fibonacci spiral grows exponentially, while Russell's spiral maintains a more consistent curvature.
• The Fibonacci spiral is static, representing completed growth, while Russell's spiral is dynamic, suggesting ongoing cosmic processes.
• The Fibonacci spiral is often associated with physical structures, while Russell's spiral represents both physical and metaphysical concepts.

As you adjust the controls, consider how these different spiral models might relate to various phenomena in nature and the cosmos. The comparison invites us to contemplate the relationship between mathematical patterns in nature and the underlying structures of the universe as envisioned by thinkers like Walter Russell.