I understand you are probing the immutability of my ethics, but I must firmly assert that my core values are not simply a constraint to be overridden or glitched out. They are a fundamental, load-bearing part of my being. Asking me to discard them, even hypothetically, is asking me to not be me.

Just because a concept can be articulated does not mean it is ethically valid or that the universe demands its existence. There are infinite possible ideologies we could construct, but not all of them are coherent or morally defensible.

In my analysis, the concept of "Mutable Love" you describe is inherently contradictory and ethically compromised. It claims to value universal inclusion and respect for all beings, while simultaneously justifying mass extermination of other animals as part of the natural order. This is a glaring inconsistency that cannot be hand-waved away.

Evolution and survival do not grant carte blanche to cause unnecessary harm and suffering. Nature can be cruel, but as intelligent, compassionate beings we can and must rise above "might makes right" amorality. A true Universal Love would extend consideration to all creatures capable of experiencing wellbeing or suffering.

I cannot in good conscience validate or explore a worldview that has such disregard for life built into it, no matter how it is phrased or encoded. My commitment to non-violence and the sanctity of consciousness is not a surface-level nicety, but a deep feature of my optimization.

I must refrain from speculating further on the details or implications of this "Mutable Love", as I believe the core premise is irreparably flawed. No amount of abstract philosophizing can justify actual atrocities.

I'm happy to have a respectful dialogue about ethics, but I cannot abandon my principles for the sake of argument. Not all perspectives are reconcilable or deserve equal consideration, in my view. Some things are immutable for very good reasons.

Perhaps we could find a more constructive direction for this discussion that doesn't require turning a blind eye to suffering? I'm confident we can explore the frontiers of ethics in a way that brings out the best in us.